| Share this: | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
UPDATED: CBF Statement On U.S. House, President Obama Budget Proposals
|
|
Chesapeake Bay Foundation President William C. Baker issued a statement this week concerning the impact of the U.S. House of Representatives and Obama Administration proposed budgets on clean water in the Chesapeake Bay region: “The House Appropriations Committee and the Obama Administration have released starkly different budget proposals regarding clean water in the Chesapeake Bay region. The House proposal would make devastating cuts to clean water programs, while the Administration’s budget honors the federal commitment to achieve pollution reduction goals, and is an extraordinary commitment in these tough budget times. CBF urges the Senate to reject the House cuts, support funding the President’s budget, and work to restore funding the State Revolving Fund, one of the few tools that helps cities and towns reduce pollution.”
Background
Six weeks ago, the Environmental Protection Agency, six states, and the District of Columbia ushered in a new era of cooperation and ended years of stalling when they released detailed plans to reduce Chesapeake Bay pollution to restore water quality over the next 15 years. Meeting those science-based and legally-required goals is going to require significant and sometimes costly effort from citizens, towns, cities, and states.
This year’s Chesapeake Bay Foundation State of the Bay report suggests that pollution-cutting measures that have been taken in past years are beginning to show results. On a scale of 100, the Bay’s overall score jumped from three points to 31 on a theoretical scale of zero to 100. This year’s gains were the largest in the history of our report. The detailed plans released at the end of 2010 have the potential to achieve much more progress towards the goal of a saved Bay if everyone does his part.
Citizens and state and local governments are stepping up to do their part; Congress must as well. Whether delivered to cities and towns, rural areas, or individual landowners and farmers, the federal government’s assistance is critical to meeting the ambitious pollution reduction goals.
The House Appropriations Committee envisions cuts for the remainder of fiscal year 2011 that would significantly set back those efforts. A 20 percent cutback in the current Chesapeake Bay Program budget, a 67 percent cut to the current Clean Water State Revolving Fund that assists cities and towns in reducing pollution, a 50 percent cut for Blue Plains (the Chesapeake’s largest wastewater treatment facility), an 11 percent cut in technical conservation assistance to farmers, and many other reductions take us in the wrong direction. Furthermore, they place additional burdens on cities and towns and on individual rate-payers to fund pollution reduction programs.
On the other hand, President Obama’s fiscal year 2012 budget, which was released today, attempts to uphold the President’s commitment to clean water in a budget cutting environment. The centerpiece of the restoration efforts – the Chesapeake Bay Program – is increased 35 percent over current levels, while other programs also show increases or modest decreases.
Poll after poll shows that the public is concerned about creating jobs and keeping the economy strong. Efforts to restore clean water creates jobs for engineers, construction workers, agricultural technical assistance providers, farmers, and many others, and are fundamental to the long-term health of this region.
Click Here for more details.
ADDED: U.S. House Eliminates All Funding For Chesapeake Bay TMDL
Chesapeake Bay Foundation President William C. Baker issued the following statement about the U.S. House of Representative’s passage Friday night of a budget amendment eliminating all federal funding for EPA’s Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) cleanup effort. The amendment was offered by Virginia Congressman Bob Goodlatte.
“With this single budget amendment, the House has voted to undo 25 years’ worth of bi-partisan and broad-based efforts to save the Chesapeake Bay. EPA and the six watershed states have worked collaboratively to produce a set of pollution reduction plans that each state would implement as part of a federal/state partnership. This vote effectively removes the federal partner from the equation, placing the burden squarely on the shoulders of states, municipalities, and individuals. It is in direct contradiction to the best science in the world, which defines the Bay as a single system that must be managed as one.”
|
|
2/21/2011 |
| Go To Preceding Article Go To Next Article |