The Department of Environmental Protection announced Monday it has approved the permit applications from Sunoco Pipeline LP for the Mariner East 2 Pipeline Project. DEP considered 17 Chp. 105 (Water Obstruction and Encroachment) permits and 3 Chp. 102 (Erosion and Sediment Control) permits for the project.

The Environmental Hearing Board Friday denied a request for a supercedeas by environmental advocacy groups appealing DEP’s issuance of permits for Sunoco’s Mariner East 2 natural gas liquids pipeline. (Click Here for story on appeal.)

The pipeline would transport natural gas liquids from southwest counties to Marcus Hook, in southeast Pennsylvania.

“I am proud of the immense undertaking our staff took to hold this project accountable within the confines of state law and DEP’s role in this process over the last few years,” said Acting DEP Secretary Patrick McDonnell. “This was a huge undertaking – holding five hearings during a 60-day comment period, reviewing permit applications and technical deficiencies for more than 20,000 hours, responding to 29,000 comments, and ensuring Sunoco addressed deficiencies identified in its initial applications.”

The project required a Chp. 105 permit for each of the 17 counties it crosses, as well as one Chp. 102 permit for each DEP region the project crosses (the Southwest region, the South Central region, and the Southeast region).

“The intensive review included input and feedback from scores of DEP biologists, wetland ecologists, engineers, legal staff, and permit reviewers. Further conditions were put on the operator as we move forward to ensure accountability to state standards,” explained McDonnell.

Part of the review process included revisions to the original permit applications submitted by Sunoco. These revisions were received in December 2016, in response to technical deficiency letters sent by DEP in September 2016.

The final approvals include conditions in both the Chp. 102 and Chp 105 permits to establish environmental protections specific to this project.

DEP did not hold an additional public comment period or hold additional hearings because the revisions Sunoco made to the applications did not substantively change right-of-ways nor the corridor of the permits. Previously submitted comments were still applicable.

DEP’s obligation is to ensure that installation of infrastructure like pipelines is in accordance with the relevant regulations, and that concerns raised by commentators were addressed within the scope of those regulations.

“This is not the end of the process, as DEP, working in conjunction with the Public Utility Commission, will continue to hold the project accountable to regulatory standards that protect the environment and ensure the health, public safety, and welfare of local communities,” said McDonnell.

For more information on DEP’s actions, visit DEP’s Mariner East 2 Pipeline Project webpage.

NewsClips:

Judge Denies Appeal For Temporary Halt To Mariner East 2 Pipeline Construction

EHB Judge Rejects Efforts To Block Mariner East 2 Pipeline Permits

Environmental Hearing Board Hears Appeal Of Mariner East 2 Permits

AP: Environmentalists Appeal Mariner East 2 Pipeline

Environmental Groups Fight DEP Mariner East 2 Pipeline Decision

Enviro Groups Appeal DEP Approval Of Mariner East 2 Pipeline Permits

Mariner East 2 Pipeline Still Waiting On Corps Of Engineers Permits

DEP Approves Sunoco Mariner East 2 Pipeline Project

DEP Grants Permits For Mariner East 2 Pipeline

AP: Sunoco Says Permits Clear Way To Build Mariner 2 Pipeline

Crable: State Clears Mariner East 2 Pipeline To Be Built

Wolf Denies Political Pressure In DEP Mariner East 2 Pipeline Decision

Fmr DEP Chief Says Sunoco, Not Regulators Caused Pipeline Delays

West Goshen Says Sunoco Violated Mariner East Pipeline Agreement

Editorial: Time To Let Sunoco Proceed With Mariner East Pipeline

PA Approves Key Water Permit For Contentious PennEast Pipeline

DEP Approves Water Approval For PennEast Pipeline

DEP Issues Permits To PennEast Pipeline

Condemnation Efforts Start On Atlantic Sunrise Pipeline

Atlantic Sunrise Pipeline Opponents Begin Encampment In Lancaster

Natural Gas Pipeline Planned For Centre Hall, Potter Twp

Southeast Perry County Communities Talk Gas Infrastructure

Judge Denies Request To Halt Dakota Access Pipeline Work

Army Corps Ends Study Of Disputed Dakota Pipeline Crossing

Pipeline Exec Compares Dakota Protesters To Terrorists

Related Stories:

EHB Denies Supercedeas In Enviro Groups Appeal Of Mariner East 2 Pipeline Permits

PennEast Pipeline Receives DEP Water Quality Certification

Volunteers Needed To Document Natural Features Along PennEast Pipeline Route

FERC OKs Energy Transfer Partners Rover Natural Gas Pipeline From PA To Ontario

FERC, DEP Approves Empire Pipeline In McKean County Into New York

Williams Partners: Atlantic Sunrise Pipeline To Southeast Gets FERC OK

[Posted: Feb. 13, 2017]

2/20/2017