Op-Ed: Budget Season Is Time For Residents, Legislators To Step Up For Clean Water

By Harry Campbell, Pennsylvania Director, Chesapeake Bay Foundation

Now is the time for Pennsylvanians to stand up for clean water and let elected officials know they should make reducing pollution a higher priority.

Tell legislators considering budgets at the state and federal levels to follow-through with more investments in clean water that protect the health, livelihood, and economic welfare of every Pennsylvanian and those downstream.

The Chesapeake Bay Foundation’s (CBF) State of the Bay report indicates that the Clean Water Blueprint is improving the health of the Chesapeake Bay, but Pennsylvania’s efforts lag far behind the other principle Bay states.

Unfortunately, the message hasn’t changed much in recent years. Roughly 19,000 miles of the Keystone State’s rivers and streams are harmed by pollution.

Agriculture is the leading source of water pollution, so Pennsylvania needs more acres of streamside trees, fewer cattle in the streams, and healthier soils. But at the state level, Pennsylvania’s investments in pollution reduction are an affront to all who care about safe water.

The proposed budget for fiscal year 2017-18 is the second consecutive plan since the Commonwealth committed to a new clean water strategy that does not include adequate investments in the right places and on the right practices to ensure Blueprint success.

General Fund support for the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) has been cut by $94 million since 2002-03 and the agency has 800 fewer staff members.

Pennsylvania’s investments in Growing Greener programs that support conservation districts, stream restoration, stormwater efforts and more, have gone down 75 percent in the last 16 years.

Reduced financial support for DEP, the Department of Agriculture, and the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, seriously threatens their abilities to assure public health and provide clean water that is the right of every Pennsylvanian.

The Environmental Protection Agency notified the DEP, and it should be a warning to Pennsylvanians, that because it lacks resources, the agency cannot enforce minimum federal safe drinking water regulations.

In addition to increasing support through in the General Fund, we urge state lawmakers to pursue additional sources of revenue, so the Commonwealth can meet the commitment it made to its citizens to help restore and protect our rivers and streams.

Ninety percent of Pennsylvanians who responded to a 2015 Penn State University survey said they support investments in saving clean water, forests, and farms.

Investments in federal Farm Bill programs also play a critical role in the ability of Pennsylvania farmers to reduce pollution, improve soil health, and make their farms more profitable.

CBF has joined the Pennsylvania Farm Bureau, conservation districts, Audubon Pennsylvania and 500 other organizations nationwide asking members of the congressional Budget and Appropriations committees to reject calls for cuts to 2018 Farm Bill programs.

We expect Pennsylvania’s own members of Congress to remember that clean water counts, and to likewise protect Farm Bill investments.

Clean water is a legacy worth leaving future generations. Legislators at all levels must remember that the health, way of life, and economic well-being of every Pennsylvanian depend on it.

For more on Chesapeake Bay-related issues in Pennsylvania, visit the Chesapeake Bay Foundation-PA webpage.  Click Here to sign up for Pennsylvania updates (bottom of left column).  Click Here for a copy of CBF-PA’s most recent newsletter.


McKelvey: Will Trump’s EPA Let PA Off The Hook For Chesapeake Bay Cleanup?

AP: Members Of Congress Ask Trump To Back Chesapeake Bay Cleanup Effort

Report: Proposed Cut To Slash EPA’s Chesapeake Bay Funds 93%

Proposed EPA Cuts Could Devastate Chesapeake Bay Cleanup Plan

Trump Eyes Plan To Cut EPA Staff 20%, Cut Grants To States 30%

Here Are 42 Of Trump’s Proposed EPA Budget Cuts

Trump Takes Hatchet To EPA

Trump To Propose 24 Percent Cut In EPA Spending

Op-Ed: Stand Up For Clean Water

Letter: Federal Farm Bill Programs Deserve Support

Letter: Congress Should Prioritize Farm Bill Conservation Funding

Crable: Lancaster Farmers Applaud Trump For Returning Water Protection To States

Crable: Add This Holtwood No-Till Farmer To Famous Names From Lancaster County

Latest From The Chesapeake Bay Journal

Related Stories:

Sen. Yaw Asks For Plan On How PA Will Meet Chesapeake Bay Cleanup Obligations

PA Chesapeake Bay Commission Members Spotlight Need For Clean Water Fund In PA

CBF-PA: Wolf’s Budget Lacks Adequate Investments To Meet PA’s Clean Water Commitments

House DEP Budget Hearing Focuses On Safe Drinking Water, Permitting, Pipelines, Chesapeake Bay

Op-Ed: Budget Season Is Time For Residents, Legislators To Step Up For Clean Water

CBF: Proposal To Cut EPA Chesapeake Bay Funding Inconsistent With President’s Statements On Clean Water

Chesapeake Bay - PA In The Balance Conference Report Now Available From Penn State

Trump Considering 30% Cut In State EPA Grants, 20% Cut To EPA Staff

[Posted: Feb. 27, 2017]


Go To Preceding Article     Go To Next Article

Return to This PA Environment Digest's Main Page