By Terry R. Bossert, Post & Schell, The Legal Intelligencer

On June 20, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued a significant and potentially far-reaching opinion in Pennsylvania Environmental Defense Foundation (PEDF) v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 2017 Pa. LEXIS 1393, No. 10 MAP 2015 (June 20, 2017).

While initial attention has been paid to the decision's potential monetary impact via the use of oil and gas lease funds, a more detailed analysis reveals that the longer lasting impact of PEDF will be found in its pronouncements on the scope of judicial review of government actions and, perhaps, implicating the separation of powers among the three branches of the government.

Click Here to read the entire article.

Terry R. Bossert is the former chief counsel for the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection and a principal in Post & Schell’s environmental practice group and co-chair of the firm’s shale resource practice group.

NewsClips:

Op-Ed: PA High Court Addresses Scope Of The Environmental Rights Amendment 

The Legal Intelligencer - Energy & Environmental Law Supplement July 25

Related Articles:

Op-Ed: Taking The Public Trust Seriously: the PA Supreme Court’s Landmark Decision In PEDF v. Commonwealth

Op-Ed: PA Supreme Court Has Save Our State Forests And Parks!

Op-Ed: The Impact Of The PA Supreme Court Environmental Rights Amendment Ruling On The Environment

PEDF Submits Brief To Declare FY17-18 Oil & Gas Fund Transfers Unconstitutional

PEDF Petitions Court To Declare 2017-18 General Fund Budget Bill Unconstitutional

PEDF Asks Court To Determine If $383 Million Transferred From Oil & Gas Lease Fund Remains In The Public Trust

PA Supreme Court Declares Law Diverting Oil & Gas Lease Funds To General Fund Unconstitutional

[Posted: July 25, 2017]

7/31/2017