On August 29, the Public Utility Commission approved a Joint Petition for Approval of Settlement authorizing the initiation of bi-directional service of petroleum products along the Laurel Pipeline, while preserving the existing east-to-west capacity that enables transportation service from points of origin near Philadelphia to delivery points in western Pennsylvania.

The Commission voted 5-0 to adopt a Recommended Decision by Administrative Law Judge Eranda Vero recommending approval of the joint settlement agreement among Laurel Pipeline Company, L.P. (Laurel); the PUC’s independent Bureau of Investigation and Enforcement (I&E); and several Complainants, including Giant Eagle, Inc., Guttman Energy, Inc., Lucknow-Highspire Terminals LLC, Monroe Energy, Philadelphia Energy Solutions Refining & Marketing LLC, and Sheetz, Inc.

The settlement agreement reaffirms the Commission’s jurisdiction over the Laurel Pipeline.  In its Statement in Support (of the settlement agreement), I&E asserted that Laurel satisfactorily addressed safety issues raised in this proceeding, stipulating the company’s commitment to ongoing compliance with federal pipeline safety regulations while providing for I&E’s Safety Division to continue pipeline inspections. 

The joint settlement agreement also includes the following key provisions:

-- Guarantees the Complainants substantial east-to-west capacity on the Laurel pipeline for a significant period of time;

-- Limits, subject to contingencies, Laurel and Buckeye’s right to propose further extensions of bi-directional service or a full reversal of service;

-- Establishes a process for disseminating information, convening calls/meetings to resolve complaints regarding bi-directional service; and

-- Permits the proposed initiation of bi-directional service on October 1, 2019, pursuant to Transportation Service Agreements between Buckeye and certain committed shippers, providing access to new Pennsylvania markets for petroleum products originating in the Midwest.

Documents related to this case can be found at PUC Docket No.: C-2018-3003365.

Related Articles:

DEP Issues Sunoco $319,461 In Penalties For Mariner East 2 Pipeline Construction Violations In 2017, 2018; Fines Now Total $13 Million+

PUC Extends Comment Period On Enhancements To Pipeline Safety Regulations To Sept. 11

PUC PA One Call Compliance Committee Imposes $47,250 In Penalties For Violating Excavation Rules Near Pipelines, Other Underground Utilities

NewsClips:

Maykuth: New Laurel Pipeline Deal To Bring More Midwestern Fuel To Pennsylvania

2-Way Flow Of Laurel Pipeline Approved By PUC

Wolf Tells Pipeline Activists He Won’t Shut Down Mariner East Pipelines

Lawmakers, Wolf Grapple With How To Ensure Pipeline Safety Without Damaging Key Industry

Hurdle: PUC’s Review Of Pipeline Regs Prompts Calls By Residents, Groups, Lawmakers For More Regulation

Beaver Conservation District Said It Needs More Information Before Responding To DEP Permitting Audit

Frazier: Beaver Conservation District Says DEP Should Let It Keep Reviewing Pipeline Permits

Maykuth: DEP Fines Sunoco $319,000 For Mariner East 2 Pipeline Construction Violations

Phillips: DEP Fines Sunoco $313,000 For Mariner East Construction Violations

Sewickley Creek Spill Among Those Cited In $313,000 Sunoco Mariner East 2 Pipeline Penalty

Phillips: Criminal Defense Counsel Represents DEP Employees In Mariner East Pipeline Probe

AP: FERC Clears Way For 124-Mile Natural Gas Pipeline Over NY Objections

Erie To Ohio Natural Gas Pipeline Nears Completion

Click Here To Read Environment & Energy NewsClips From Last 7 Days

[Posted: August 29, 2019]

9/2/2019