PA Environment Digest

Share this:

Op-Ed: PA Efforts To Curb Chesapeake Bay Pollution Have Stalled, Leaving Bay At Risk

By Former EPA Administrators Gina McCarthy & William Reilly

The following op-ed appeared in the September 3 Philadelphia Inquirer--

This summer, the Chesapeake Bay has one of the largest dead zones in the last 30 years. And Pennsylvania pollution is a significant contributor to that problem.

One river, the Susquehanna, flowing mostly through Pennsylvania, is responsible for nearly 50 percent of the flow into the Chesapeake Bay.

Frustratingly, pollution that has been entering the Susquehanna continues to flow downstream into the Bay at levels that are putting the entire Bay recovery at risk.

The affected states, the District of Columbia and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) can no longer stand by and let that happen.

The Chesapeake Bay’s restoration is at a pivotal moment. Every state needs to do its fair share, and the federal government needs to do its job to hold all accountable, to reduce the pollution that has been flowing down state waterways and choking the Bay.

Clean water for 18 million people and an estimated $130 billion in annual natural resource benefits hang in the balance.

The Chesapeake Bay is the nation’s largest estuary, a vast system of freshwater streams, tidal rivers and coastal wetlands across a 64,000—square—mile watershed. It’s not just worth protecting, it must be protected.

The good news is real progress has already been achieved. Farmers, many states and local governments, and businesses have stepped up.

As a result, the partnership achieved an estimated 40 percent of its nitrogen reduction goal and 87 percent of its phosphorus reduction goal between 2009 and 2017.

But efforts in Pennsylvania have stalled, and the state is falling behind in its commitment to the Bay and to the other jurisdictions that are far in front. Simply put, the Commonwealth’s current plan to cut pollution falls far short of its requirements under the agreed upon Blueprint allocations.

Even worse, Pennsylvania officials themselves say their plan is underfunded by over $300 million, annually.

Without success in Pennsylvania, the entire restoration partnership is at risk of failing, and the Bay will not recover.

We served as EPA Administrators under two presidents, one a Republican and one a Democrat. What began in 1983 as a largely voluntary effort to reduce pollution in the Chesapeake became a federal mandate to enforce the Clean Water Act.

In 2010, under President Obama, EPA established science-based pollution limits for the Bay. That action had teeth—it gave birth to the Chesapeake Clean Water Blueprint which allocated pollution reduction targets to each of the six Bay states and the District of Columbia and set a deadline of 2025 to ensure all measures are in place to reach those targets.

EPA can impose financial and regulatory consequences on any jurisdiction that fails to meet its commitments.

Against the backdrop of a federal administration hell bent on dismantling the Clean Water Act—the foundational law that protects our nation’s waterways—the Chesapeake Bay Executive Council meets on Thursday, September 5 to chart the final phase of the most ambitious environmental restoration effort ever initiated under the law’s purview.

The Council, which includes the governors of each Bay state, the mayor of the District of Columbia, the chair of the Chesapeake Bay Commission, and the EPA Administrator, must collectively work together to take a firm stand.

Reducing pollution in Pennsylvania alone won’t in and of itself save the Bay. But it will help clean 19,000 miles of polluted streams so the folks in Pennsylvania who deserve a clean river to fish and swim in get that chance, and the folks downstream get to enjoy the pollution reduction benefits as well.

A proposed resolution drafted by the Chesapeake Bay Foundation is a good start. If passed, it will commit the Council to help Pennsylvania raise the necessary funds to get its part of the restoration job done.

If Pennsylvania does not get its job done, then EPA will be asked to use its Clean Water Act authority to hold the Commonwealth accountable to its targets. The resolution is not a giveaway; it is an offer to help with insurance backing it up.

The Chesapeake Bay is a national treasure. Saving it is a national imperative that will fulfill a commitment our country made half a century ago to ensure all waterways are fishable, swimmable and clean. It is time for leadership.

Gina McCarthy served as EPA Administrator for President Barack Obama from 2013-2017. William Reilly served as EPA Administrator for President George H.W. Bush from 1989-1993.

(Photo: Muddy water from Pennsylvania passes through the Conowingo Dam.)

NewsClips:

Click Here for Last Week’s Environment & Energy NewsClips

Related Articles:

Chesapeake Bay Foundation Urges PA To Meet Its Water Pollution Reduction Goals

Pennsylvania Has Permanently Protected More Land In Chesapeake Bay Watershed Than Any Other Individual Bay State

Op-Ed: Time For Greater State, Federal Support Of Farmers' Clean Water Efforts

Op-Ed: Commit To Saving Chesapeake Bay - Fmr Gov. Dick Thornburgh

Baltimore Sun: Let's Sue Pennsylvania To Get Serious About Cleaning Up Its Water Going To The Chesapeake Bay, Part II

Op-Ed: PA Efforts To Curb Chesapeake Bay Pollution Have Stalled, Leaving Bay At Risk - By Former EPA Administrators Gina McCarthy & William Reilly

Maryland Governor Calls For Action, Accountability On PA's Plan To Reduce Water Pollution Going To Chesapeake Bay

DEP, Agriculture, DCNR Layout Their Hopes For Final Chesapeake Bay Healthy Waters, Healthy Communities Watershed Plan