Op-Ed: Don't You Know Pennsylvania Doesn't Have Land On The Chesapeake Bay?
Photo

By Will Baker, President, Chesapeake Bay Foundation PA

“Will! Don’t you know Pennsylvania does not have land on the Bay!?”

That is a question I often get when I cite the scientific consensus that the Bay will not be saved unless Pennsylvania drastically decreases the amount of nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment flowing into the Susquehanna and its tributary rivers.

It is often combined with more spicy commentary about how CBF is being unfair, or worse.

Let’s look at the facts.

First, the Susquehanna River supplies fully one half of all fresh water entering the Bay.

Scientists are confident that nearly 50 million pounds of nitrogen still need to be reduced watershed-wide by 2025 to meet water-quality standards under the federal Clean Water Act.

More than 70 percent of the reduction must come from Pennsylvania.

The science behind these numbers has not been challenged, and Pennsylvania has repeatedly reiterated its promise to meet the reductions.

Why? Because the Bay is a national treasure and many Pennsylvanians enjoy its proximity for food and recreation.

But there is more.

Pennsylvania has more than 15,000 miles of self-designated polluted streams, rivers, and drinking water resources in the Bay watershed.

Much of the same pollution harms the Bay just downstream. And CBF’s peer-reviewed economic report estimates efforts to restore Pennsylvania’s rivers and streams would add $6.2 billion in natural benefits each year.

A chain is only as strong as its weakest link. Science has long made clear that the Chesapeake is a 64,000-square-mile system of land and waters. If Pennsylvania fails, the Bay partnership fails.

Now, here is the good news: putting best management practices to work on Pennsylvania’s farms is the most effective and least expensive strategy to reduce pollution in local waters. And the Bay.

Farmers are willing to invest their time and resources to install them because the practices make good agronomic sense. But they need technical assistance, tax incentives, and cost-share funding to help.

Municipalities and industries have historically received the same help.

We must now harness the collective political clout of the entire region to make the case for state and federal dollars to help Pennsylvania establish a dedicated, consistent funding source.

The six states in the Bay watershed and the District of Columbia have correctly bragged for years about their historic partnership to save the Bay. It is unlike anything else in the world.

Now is the time to act like a partnership. After all, the states in the Bay watershed are not going to give up on saving the Bay again, are they?

For more on Chesapeake Bay-related issues in Pennsylvania, visit the Chesapeake Bay Foundation-PA webpage.  Click Here to sign up for Pennsylvania updates (bottom of left column).  Click Here to support their work.

Also visit the Keystone 10 Million Trees Partnership to learn how you can help clean water grow on trees.

For more information on how Pennsylvania plans to meet its Chesapeake Bay cleanup obligations, visit DEP’s PA’s Phase 3 Watershed Implementation Plan webpage.

Click Here for a summary of the steps the Plan recommends.

(Photo: Forest buffers separate farm fields from the West Branch Susquehanna River as it flows through Clinton County.)

Related Articles - Chesapeake Bay:

Chesapeake Bay Foundation Preparing To Sue EPA Over Lack Of Enforcement Over PA Progress In Cleanup Plan

DEP Releases Water Quality Assessment Showing 40% Of PA Streams Polluted By Agriculture, Abandoned Mines, Stormwater Runoff

Report: PA Would See A $6.2 Billion Economic Benefit From Chesapeake Bay Cleanup

PA Chesapeake Bay Phase III WIP State Team Hears Implementation Off To Fast Start

Growing Greener Coalition: Tremendous Backlog Of Environmental Infrastructure Needs Demand Much Higher Levels Of Investment By State

Analysis: 2020 Is A Make Or Break Year For Environmental Funding -- It’s Our Turn Now!

Budget Background: Where Did The $2.93 Billion In Environmental Funding The General Assembly Diverted Or Cut Go?

Report: Sen. Yaw: Raising Enough Money To Implement PA’s Chesapeake Bay Clean Water Plan-- Isn't Going To Happen

Senate Environmental Committee Puts Spotlight On Funding Needed To Implement PA Clean Water Plan At Chesapeake Bay Briefing

Related Articles - Water Quality:

29 PA Conservation Districts Receive $67,000 For 41 Nonpoint Source Pollution Prevention Education Projects

Dept. Of Agriculture Now Accepting Applications For Grants To Help Transition To Organic Farming

Using Cover Crops With High Tunnels Can Suppress Soil Pathogens, Pests, Improve Soil Health

Reminder: NRCS-PA Conservation Stewardship Program Renewals Due Now

Eastern PA Coalition For Abandoned Mine Reclamation Joins Keystone 10 Million Trees Partnership To Clean Up PA's Waterways

Over 100 Groups Sign Letter Urging Congressional Action On Federal Mine Reclamation Fee, Black Lung Bills

Registration Now Open For PA Abandoned Mine Reclamation Conference June 24-25

DEP Accepting Bids For Abandoned Mine Reclamation Projects In Allegheny, Clearfield, Fayette Counties

Canceled Riparian Forest Buffer Summit To Be Rescheduled For 2021

A Movement Grows To Help Farmers Reduce Pollution And Turn A Profit With Working Riparian Buffers

Op-Ed: From Rooftops To Rivers, Solving The Big Problem Of Stormwater With Local Solutions

PA Lake Management Society Recognizes Winners Of Lake Management Awards

CBF-PA, Local Groups Host More Than A Dozen On-Water Experiences For Students In 8 PA Counties

Consider Creating A Meaningful Watershed Educational Experience For Students

Schuylkill Action Network Accepting Applications For Schuylkill Acts & Impacts Watershed Expedition For High School Students

DEP Environmental Ed Grant Helps Fund Algal Bloom Education In Erie

Stroud: Modeling Mayflies To Understand The Challenges Of A Warming Planet

[Posted: March 12, 2020]


3/16/2020

Go To Preceding Article     Go To Next Article

Return to This PA Environment Digest's Main Page