By Jeff Mulhollem, Penn State News

The vast majority of nutrients and sediment washed into streams flowing into the Chesapeake Bay are picked up by deluges from severe storms that occur on relatively few days of the year.

That is the conclusion of a new study led by Penn State researchers, who say it offers clues for cleaning up the impaired estuary.

“A small percentage of locations and events contribute to the vast majority of total annual pollution loads entering the bay,” said Heather Preisendanz, associate professor of agricultural and biological engineering, College of Agricultural Sciences. “These findings stress the importance of concentrating our efforts on ‘hot moments’ --  not just ‘hot spots’ -- across impaired watersheds to achieve water-quality-restoration goals.”

Researchers analyzed eight years of data from 108 sites in the Chesapeake Bay Program’s nontidal monitoring network. They looked at daily-scale records of flow and corresponding loads of total nitrogen, total phosphorus and total suspended sediment at each gauging station from 2010 through 2018.

Then, in an innovative move, they applied a formula normally used in economics to the data to determine the distribution of pollution loads throughout the years.

“Using Lorenz Inequality and the Gini Coefficient, both of which first were used in the early 1900s to quantify inequity in wealth distribution, we were able to measure the degree of inequality of nutrient and sediment loads across the study years,” said Preisendanz. “This approach allowed us to identify periods of time and corresponding flow conditions that must be targeted to achieve needed load-reduction goals across the watershed.”

Recently published in Environmental Research Letters, the study’s conclusions make a strong case for watershed planners and managers to use a temporal framework to develop low- and high-flow targets for nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment loads specific to each watershed within the bay’s 64,000-square-mile basin.

The seven states in the Chesapeake’s watershed have been federally mandated since 2010 to continually reduce nutrient and sediment loads reaching the bay.

The study portends a change for the bay, Preisendanz contends, because until now, processes for determining how to reduce total annual pollution loads at a watershed scale have targeted spatial, but not temporal, components of inequality — hot spots but not hot moments.

“I think this offers some insight as to why we haven't met goals for restoring the bay’s water quality,” she said. “There's been a lot of frustration around how much time and money has been spent and the number of best-management practices that have been adopted. We're still significantly behind where we need to be-- especially in Pennsylvania.”

Preisendanz also suggested the research may inject a badly needed dose of pragmatism into the debate about if and how the Chesapeake can be cleaned up, using best-management practices such as streamside buffers that function properly, streamside fencing, nutrient management plans for farms, continuous no-till crop cultivation and cover crops.

“Now that we know the dynamics of nutrient and sediment transport across the bay watershed, we may need to think differently about how we approach our goals,” she said. “If the reality is that we can’t deal with the highest flows from severe storms-- which, by the way, are becoming more intense due to climate change-- then we need to design a system that is more efficient at achieving load-reduction goals during low flows.”

One of the team’s hopes is that because its analysis was based on an approach that is easily understandable to a broad audience-- using the analogy of temporal inequality to income inequality-- the temporal targeting framework will be widely adopted by regulators, Preisendanz explained. People understand that inequality is ubiquitous not only in human-impacted systems, but also in natural systems, she pointed out.

“I like to ask people how unequally the number of strawberries produced in their garden was spread across their strawberry plants, because everyone has a super-productive and super-unproductive plant,” she said “That analogy is exactly transferable to understanding hot spots and hot moments, and why it is so important to manage them both. The team embraces the notion that in every challenge, there lies an opportunity.”

These findings show what successfully reducing pollution loads in waterways feeding the bay would look like in the real world, Preisendanz noted. “Rather than an ‘everything, everywhere, all-the-time’ approach, focusing on hot spots and hot moments reduces the problem to finding ‘the right solutions in the right places that work at the right time’ approach.”

Also involved in the research were James Shortle, Penn State Distinguished Professor of Agricultural and Environmental Economics; Tamie Veith, agricultural engineer with the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit; and Qian Zhang, assistant research scientist with the University of Maryland’s Center for Environmental Science and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Chesapeake Bay Research Program.

The Penn State Institutes of Energy and the Environment, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Chesapeake Bay Program partially funded this research.

[How Clean Is Your Stream?

[DEP’s Interactive Report Viewer allows you to zoom in on your own stream or watershed to find out how clean your stream is or if it has impaired water quality using the latest information in the draft 2020 Water Quality Report.].

(Reprinted from Penn State News)

Related Articles - Water:

-- Vote Online Now For Pennsylvania's 2021 River Of the Year

-- Coldwater Heritage Partnership Now Accepting Conservation Grant Applications

-- Bay Journal: Landowners, Turkey Hill Dairy, Trout Unlimited, Lancaster Clean Water Partners, Conservation Districts, NFWF, Chesapeake Conservancy, Others Partner On Precision Conservation In PA

-- DEP Provides Update On Chesapeake Bay Watershed Implementation Plan Efforts; New Stormwater Manual Coming; Next State Team Meeting Jan. 26

-- Introducing A Diversion Best Management Practice To Control Erosion, Sedimentation And Runoff At Timberidge Farms, York County

-- Penn State Extension: Stormwater Training For Municipal Staff, Elected Officials

-- CBF: Salt For Snow And Ice: Effects On Waterways Not Very Nice

-- The Importance Of Snow And Forests To PA Streams And Groundwater

-- EPA Recognizes Excellence & Innovation in Clean Water Infrastructure Projects, Including Temple University Green Roof Project

-- Presentation Videos From 2020 Delaware Watershed Congress Now Available

-- DEP Announces $248,000 In Grants For Lake Erie Coastal Zone

-- DEP Announces $579,432 In Grants For Delaware Estuary Coastal Zone

-- Delaware River Basin Commission Recaps Dec. 9 Business Meeting

-- Save The Date: DRBC Advisory Committee On Climate Change To Host Climate Change Forum March 2

-- Andrew Johnson, William Penn Foundation’s Director Of Watershed Programs, To Retire In 2021

-- Dept. Of Agriculture Unveils Schedule For Virtual 2021 PA Farm Show; Highlights Of Educational, Environmental, Energy Events

-- Susquehanna River Basin Commission Releases Draft Comprehensive Plan For Public Comment; January Webinars Set

-- Susquehanna River Basin Commission Recaps Dec. 11 Business Meeting

-- PA, MD, VA Student Leaders Draft New Chesapeake Bay Outdoor Bill Of Rights

-- Op-Ed: Biden-Harris Administration Should Invest In The Chesapeake Bay And Farmers - U.S. Senator Bob Casey

Related Article - Climate:

-- 2021 PA Climate Impact Assessment: 13% Increase In Extremely Heavy Precipitation Events By 2050; DEP Advisory Committee Discusses Draft Impact Report, Climate Action Plan Dec. 22

[Posted: December 15, 2020]

12/21/2020